47 research outputs found
Philosophy of Disability as Critical Diversity Studies
Critical diversity studies (CDS) can be found within “traditional,” or “established,”
university disciplines, such as philosophy, as well as in relatively newer departments
of the university, such as African studies departments, women’s and gender studies
departments, and disability studies departments. In this article, therefore, I explain why
philosophy of disability, an emerging subfield in the discipline of philosophy, should
be recognized as an emerging area of CDS also. My discussion in the article situates
philosophy of disability in CDS by both distinguishing this new subfield’s claims
about disability from the arguments about disability that mainstream philosophers
make and identifying the assumptions about social construction and antiessentialism
that philosophy of disability shares with other areas of CDS. The discussion is
designed to show that a (feminist) philosophy of disability that draws upon the work
of Michel Foucault will transform how philosophers understand the situation of
disabled people. By drawing upon Foucault, that is, I offer philosophers of disability
and other practitioners of CDS a new understanding of disability as an apparatus of
power relations
Philosophy and the Apparatus of Disability
Abstract and Keywords
Mainstream philosophers take for granted that disability is a prediscursive, transcultural, and transhistorical disadvantage, an objective human defect or characteristic that ought to be prevented, corrected, eliminated, or cured. That these assumptions are contestable, that it might be the case that disability is a historically and culturally specific, contingent social phenomenon, a complex apparatus of power, rather than a natural attribute or property that certain people possess, is not considered, let alone seriously entertained. This chapter draws on the insights of Michel Foucault to advance a historicist and relativist conception of disability as an apparatus (dispositif) of power and identify mechanisms of power within philosophy that produce the underrepresentation of disabled philosophers in the profession and the marginalization of philosophy of disability in the discipline.
Keywords: disability, Michel Foucault, apparatus, historicist, relativist, underrepresentation of disabled philosopher
Feminist Philosophy of Disability: A Genealogical Intervention
This article is a feminist intervention into the ways that disability is researched and represented in philosophy at present. Nevertheless, some of the claims that I make over the course of the article are also pertinent to the marginalization in philosophy of other areas of inquiry, including philosophy of race, feminist philosophy more broadly, indigenous philosophies, and LGBTQI philosophy. Although the discipline of philosophy largely continues to operate under the guise of neutrality, rationality, and objectivity, the institutionalized structure of the discipline implicitly and explicitly promotes certain ontologies, epistemologies, and methodologies as bona fide philosophy, while casting the ontologies, epistemologies, and methodologies of marginalized philosophies as mere simulacra of allegedly fundamental ways of knowing and doing philosophy and thus rendering these marginalized philosophies more or less expendable. This article is designed to show that legitimized philosophical discourses are vital mechanisms in the problematization of disability
This is What a Historicist and Relativist Feminist Philosophy of Disability Looks Like
ABSTRACT: With this article, I advance a historicist and relativist feminist philosophy of disability. I argue that Foucault’s insights offer the most astute tools with which to engage in this intellectual enterprise. Genealogy, the technique of investigation that Friedrich Nietzsche famously introduced and that Foucault took up and adapted in his own work, demonstrates that Foucault’s historicist approach has greater explanatory power and transgressive potential for analyses of disability than his critics in disability studies have thus far recognized. I show how a feminist philosophy of disability that employs Foucault’s technique of genealogy avoids ahistorical, teleological, and transcultural assumptions that beleaguer much work in disability studies. The article also situates feminist philosophical work on disability squarely in age-old debates in (Eurocentric) Western philosophy about universalism vs. relativism, materialism vs. idealism, realism vs. nominalism, and freewill vs. determinism, as well as contributes to ongoing discussions in (Western) feminist philosophy and theory about (among other things) essentialism vs. constructivism, identity, race, sexuality, agency, and experience